Academic Program Review Process

PNW’s Academic Program Review is intended to be a collaborative process involving each department and/or school, college, the Academic Program Peer Review Corps and the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and Provost.

It is designed to be a reflective and analytical process that will lead to program improvement, and its results can be used as input into a variety of strategic and programmatic decisions.

Download the Full Guide (2.2 MB)

Resources

Each academic program will participate in the PNW Academic Program Review process during its assigned slot in the master calendar. The process includes faculty review of assessment of student learning results, analysis of statistical data, the completion of a self-study document, and an in-person presentation to the Academic Program Peer Review Corps.

Our Purpose

The faculty is responsible for curriculum; therefore, APR is a faculty responsibility. The AAPRC is composed of faculty from all colleges and is charged to oversee the process of Academic Program Review across the University.

The improvement of overall academic quality is an ongoing objective. The intent of APR is to support each program in developing and maintaining its own continuous system of academic program review. Within such a system, periodic academic program review serves as an opportunity for a global consideration of the program.

Quality is systemic. While APR originates at the individual program level, the analysis expands to incorporate activities and support services at the department or school, college, and university levels.

The review of a particular program aims to situate it in the context of Purdue University Northwest’s unique mission and values statements and its strategic plan. In so doing, APR seeks to enhance learning within a particular unit and across units, and to further the evolution of a university culture characterized by ongoing institutional self-analysis leading to continually improved practices.

To be efficient, APR’s are conducted within a clearly limited time frame. Thus, each unit is asked to identify important issues during the APR planning stage, investigate them along with those required by the process, and report accordingly. The aim is meaningful reflection in areas identified by the program’s faculty.

The APR process seeks to support and sustain conversations among various university constituents that lead to the identification and analysis of a particular program’s strengths and areas for improvement. The inclusion of multiple diverse perspectives is intended to help programs share their strengths as well as facilitate improved university-wide understanding of the varied disciplinary and professional languages and norms that compose the University. In addition, the self-study stimulates a culture of continuous reflection, internal research, and collegial accountability that is both program-based and university-wide.

The APR process seeks to facilitate the development of plans of action supported by analyzed data. In so doing, APR seeks to support internal research and, through its ongoing activity, continually refine the University’s academic information systems to support decision-making at the program, department or school, college, and university levels.

AAPRC’s review encourages a cross-discipline/cross-profession dialogue and accountability for the University’s curricular programs as a whole. The APR process combines the strengths of internal review, best understood within the context of Purdue University Northwest’s mission and array of programs, with external discipline-specific review, ensuring that academic programs represent current practice within the discipline.

The APR process is dynamic, reflective, and evolving. While the overall purpose of continuous improvement is paramount, specific features of the process may be modified as needed for any individual program to ensure the purpose is met. Ongoing assessment of the process as a whole will result in modifications as indicated by results.

The outcome of the APR process is the identification of sound initiatives for improving quality that are supported by both data and broad-based understanding of a wide- array of PNW stakeholders (e.g., students, faculty, residents of northwest Indiana, etc.).

Academic Program Review Calendar

College Department/ ProgramReview ScheduleSelf-Study Due DatesPresentation Dates First Friday March/OctoberFeedback Due First Friday April/NovemberProvost Letter End of SemesterMidcycle Review (if
needed)
CES
Biological Sciences
Spring 20211-Dec-205-Mar-212-Apr-21May, 2021Fall 2023
COB
School of HTM
Spring 20211-Dec-205-Mar-212-Apr-21May, 2021Fall 2023
CHESS
School of Education
Fall 20211-May-211-Oct-21November 5,
2021
December, 2021Spring 2024
CHESS
Communication
Fall 20211-May-211-Oct-21November 5,
2021
December, 2021Spring 2024
CES/SOE
Mechanical and Civil
Engineering
Spring 20221-Dec-214-Mar-221-Apr-22May, 2022Fall 2024
CES/SOE
Computer and Electrical
Engineering
Fall 20221-May-227-Oct-22November 4,
2022
December, 2022Spring 2025
COT CITGFall 20221-May-227-Oct-22November 4,
2022
December, 2022Spring 2025
CHESS
History/Philosophy
Spring 20231-Dec-223-Mar-237-Apr-23May, 2023Fall 2025
CHESS
Psychology
Spring 20231-Dec-223-Mar-237-Apr-23May, 2023Fall 2025
CHESS
Behavioral Sciences
Fall 20231-May-236-Oct-23November 3,
2023
December, 2023Spring 2026
COB
Managerial Studies
Spring 20241-Dec-231-Mar-245-Apr-24May, 2024Fall 2026
COB
Quantitative Business
Studies
Fall 20241-May-234-Oct-24November 1,
2024
December, 2024Spring 2027
COT CSOLSpring 20251-Dec-247-Mar-254-Apr-25May, 2025Fall 2027
COT
Engineering Technology
Spring 20251-Dec-247-Mar-254-Apr-25May, 2025Fall 2027
CES
Chemistry/Physics
Fall 20251-May-253-Oct-25November 7,
2025
December, 2025Spring 2028
CHESS
English
Fall 20251-May-253-Oct-25November 7,
2025
December, 2025Spring 2028
CES MSSCSSpring 20261-Dec-256-Mar-263-Apr-26May, 2026Fall 2028
CHESS PEWSpring 20261-Dec-256-Mar-263-Apr-26May, 2026Fall 2028
COT
Graduate Programs
Fall 20261-May-262-Oct-26November 6,
2026
December, 2026Spring 2029
CES
Biological Sciences
Fall 20261-May-262-Oct-26November 6,
2026
December, 2026Spring 2029
COB
School of HTM
Spring 20271-Dec-265-Mar-272-Apr-27May, 2027Fall 2029
CHESS
School of Education
Spring 20271-Dec-265-Mar-272-Apr-27May, 2027Fall 2029
CON
Nursing
Spring 20281-Dec-273-Mar-287-Apr-28May, 2028Fall 2030

Deliverables

From Each Program

A completed program review self-study including quantitative and qualitative analysis of the program consistent with the PNW APR guidelines as described in the following pages.

From the Academic Program Peer Review Corps

A thorough review of the program self-study which results in a final report that situates the program within the larger structure of the University in a way that both highlights actual and potential connections between the program and other units or university stakeholders and suggests opportunities for growth.

From the Academic Program Review Process

A set of initiatives for improvement agreed upon by the program, the department or school, the college, and the University. An official plan of action outlines agreed- upon courses of action that the program will take over the next several years to support improved academic quality. It also identifies resource support priorities for academic improvement.

Academic Program Peer Review Corps

The Purdue Northwest APR is faculty-driven as noted above; the faculty is responsible for curriculum; therefore, APR is a faculty responsibility.

The Academic Program Peer Review Corps (APPRC) is composed of faculty from all colleges and is charged to oversee the process of Academic Program Review across the University. The APR Review Committee is drawn from this body.

  • The APPRC is comprised of eleven (11) faculty members, with two representatives from each of the five PNW academic Colleges and one from the Faculty Senate, with “faculty” being defined as full-time, benefits-eligible, and current voting members of the instructional staff.
  • Representatives will be selected by the end of the Spring semester, with terms beginning the following Fall.
  • The members from each college will be decided by a College-level nomination process and college-wide vote. The single Faculty Senate member should be nominated and voted on by the Faculty Senate.
  • No APPRC member will participate in the review of the programs in his/her home department. Thus, the calendar below should be considered when selecting representatives.
  • The term of service will be for two years, with staggered terms so that half of the APPRC membership is replaced each academic year. Any given member may serve more than one successive term.
  • Before each Fall term begins, the Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs — Institutional Effectiveness will provide orientation and information/guidance on the duties and functions of the APPRC. The AVC-IE will also serve as an ongoing resource, support, and ex-officio member of the body.
  • Participating as active members of the PNW Academic Program Review process.
  • Serving as members of the Academic Program Review Committee, reviewing program self-studies as submitted and actively participating in reviews each semester.
  • Providing feedback to each Program being reviewed, and forwarding recommendations to the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and Provost.
  • Acting as a resource for Programs participating in the APR process.

College of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences

College of Engineering and Sciences

College of Business

College of Nursing

College of Technology

Faculty Senate 

  • Vacant (2023-2024)